Less Than A Minute

This landmark case potentially violates antitrust laws because lighting companies allegedly colluded and staged a boycott of a third lighting company. If found guilty, the defendant could owe three times the amount of damages suffered. lightED's first article in this conspiracy theory series features a Q&A with an antitrust expert who warns, "...companies should make sure they have reasons for changes in business arrangements that make sense other than for the purpose of harming competitors." This is the first article of a two part series, stay tuned.

Read the full article here...

Hand about to bang gavel on sounding block in the court room

Tell Us More About Your Project